Home » Briefs

Fordham Professor Questions Viability of Democracy in the Arab World

Submitted by on February 5 – 2013One Comment

Fordham Law Professor Thane Rosenbaum wrote an op-ed for the Wall Street Journal that examined what he called a bleak anniversary for the Arab Spring. Rosembaum documented violence throughout the region and asked whether the revolutionary wave didn’t simply replace old tyrannical regimes of instability with new ones.

While the Arab Spring may have mercifully ended the regimes of longtime secular strongmen, the revolution hasn’t brought about the core features of a democratic society: religious tolerance and pluralism, the rule of law, freedom of press and expression, respect for human rights, and equality for women, minorities and gays.

Rosenbaum questioned the practicality of democracy in the Arab world, pointing out that the elections that occurred as a result of the Arab Spring did not yield the results that some Westerners hoped for.

The courageous kids tweeting live from Tahrir Square two years ago weren’t elected to anything, even though many Westerners dreamed that they, and not Islamists, were representative of Egypt’s larger democratic aspirations. It may be that this part of the world is simply resistant to transformative democratic change. Democracy can be a medication that simply won’t take.

 Read Rosenbaum’s op-ed at the Wall Street Journal, or as it is reprinted on Fordham Law’s website.


One Comment »

  • axnjaxn says:

    “It may be that this part of the world is simply resistant to transformative democratic change.”—or it may be that Thane Rosenbaum is resistant to rational thought and intellect. Obviously the kids tweeting in Tahrir weren’t going to be elected to the Egyptian Parliament—the brotherhood was the ONLY political organization with a network of operatives and political machinery in place. Mubarak acquiesced to this reality long ago. Any elementary observer of political science, and specifically that of the middle east knows this. The brotherhood being in a better position to reap the rewards of a popular vote has NOTHING to do with “this part of the world being simply resistant to transformative democratic change.” Such a vulgar and culturally insensitive notion, to say the least, is not worthy of a Fordham professor, albeit one that doesn’t know jack about the modern east. Keep your unfounded garbage to yourself Thane.

Leave a comment!

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also Comments Feed via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

The Record reserves the right to remove any comment.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.